- Enjoyed with interruption
- As a matter of concession
- Enjoyed without interruption as right
- For twenty years
Codes :
Answer: (a) and (b) are incorrect and (c) and (d) are correct
Codes :
Answer: (a) and (b) are incorrect and (c) and (d) are correct
Answer: Slander is always a criminal offence
Codes :
Answer: (b), (c), (d) and (a)
Codes :
Answer : (a), (b), (c) and (d) are correct
Codes :
Answer: Only (a) and (c) are correct
Assertion (A) : It shall not be a defence in a prosecution for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act that the drawer had no reason to believe when he issued the cheque that the cheque may be dishonoured on presentment for the reason stated in that Section. Reason (R) : Above assertion is laid down in Section 140 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. Codes :
Answer: Both (A) and (R) are wrong
Assertion (A) : Payer alone, whether a corporeal person or incorporeal person, shall be competent in case of dishonour of cheque. Reason (R) : Because Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act mandates so. Codes :
Answer: Both (A) and (R) are wrong
Answer: Where a contract of sale is not severable and the buyer has accepted the goods or part thereof, the breach of any condition to be fulfilled by the seller can only be treated as a breach of warranty and not as a ground for rejecting the goods and treating the contract as repudiated, unless there is a term of the contract, express or implied to that effect
Codes :
Answer: (c) and (d) only
Assertion (A) : Notwithstanding a contract between the partners, a partner shall not indemnify the firm for any loss caused to it by his wilful neglect in the conduct of the business of the firm. Reason (R) : Because Section 13(f) of Indian Partnership Act stipulates so. Codes :
Answer: Both (A) and (R) are wrong
Answer: Spelt out in the Objective Resolution moved by Jawahar Lal Nehru and adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 22nd January, 1947
Answer: Balbir Thomas V/s. Centre for Cellular & Molecular Biology
Assertion (A) : High Court has no jurisdiction over the State Administrative Tribunal. Reason (R) : Because L. Chandrakumar V/s. Union of India has decided so. Codes :
Answer: Both (A) and (R) are wrong
Codes :
Answer: A, B and D
Answer: S.R. Bommai V/s. Union of India